ServiceTitan, Jobber, Housecall Pro
Compare the shared integration strategy across common field-service systems.
View stack pageCape Fear Agent Co. maps the intake path first: what the caller said, what is missing, how urgent it is, and what the owner or dispatcher should approve before a task, note, job draft, or schedule action touches ServiceTitan.
The workflow should make the cost of messy intake obvious: fewer replayed voicemails, fewer cold callbacks, fewer half-complete notes, and fewer unsafe schedule promises.
$ intake --source google-mapsOK classify: no-cool urgentOK stage dispatcher reviewBLOCK auto-dispatch promiseCaller AC is out and we need help tonight.
Agent I can collect details for the dispatcher. What town and system type?
Caller Wilmington. Split system. Photo ready.
Ready: source, town, urgency, system clue, photo status, and approval rule.
Start by proving the intake record before automating deeper writes.
| Moment | AI should collect | Stage first | Human approves |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missed urgent call | Caller, source, address, job type, urgency, photos, and missing facts. | Dispatcher review memo or task. | Capacity, arrival expectation, dispatch priority, and job creation. |
| After-hours request | Service area, emergency trigger, customer status, access, and callback need. | Owner memo plus morning queue. | Escalation, pricing language, and technician route. |
| Quote follow-up | Prior estimate, blocker, timing, scope change, and preferred channel. | Follow-up task or note. | Discount, revised scope, contract language, and close path. |
The audit turns that example into a launch packet: fields to collect, blocked promises, first safe destination, and the rule for moving deeper into ServiceTitan later.
Compare the shared integration strategy across common field-service systems.
View stack pageUse the same safe handoff logic before scheduling or dispatch writes.
View dispatch pageSend one messy intake path and get the first reviewed handoff mapped.
Request audit